Bind
目次
2005/05/08
bind / /
質問
From: rs_rlab@mail.ru
Subject: [9fans] couple namespace question
Date: 2005年5月7日 17:44:44:JST
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Reply-To: rs_rlab@mail.ru, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Hello Fans,
Why most process have 'ns' file with entryes:
bind / /
bind /net /net
bind /n /n
This is artifactes or some special functionality?
Where is sane way to use proc fs:
'#p/34/ctl' or '/proc/34/ctl'
--
http://rs-rlab.narod.ru mailto:rs_rlab@mail.ru
回答
From: russcox@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [9fans] couple namespace question
Date: 2005年5月7日 21:56:09:JST
To: rs_rlab@mail.ru, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Reply-To: russcox@gmail.com, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Why most process have 'ns' file with entryes:
bind / /
bind /net /net
bind /n /n
This is artifactes or some special functionality?
This sets up the first entry of a union mount.
In older versions you couldn't bind -a or -b
until you had explicitly started a mount point
using something like the above, but now the
kernel does them for you when necessary.
Where is sane way to use proc fs:
'#p/34/ctl' or '/proc/34/ctl'
Almost always use /proc. If you use #p then the tool
does not play well with others like snapfs or
import remote-machine /proc.
Russ